حابب تنزل على مخفر حبيش…عفواً، قصدي رأس بيروت

1920284_625331500883112_863966071_n2

تعريف المواطنين غير شامل على كل الأشخاص. بالتحديد، تنحصر الإشارة إلى الأشخاص من جنسية لبنانية (أو أوروبية أو شمال أميركية أو ما شابه) مع أوراق ثبوتية كاملة ومن طبقة اقتصادية غنية ولكن يمكن ادماج بعض الفئات من الطبقة الوسطى إذا كان في وساطة. تنطبق معايير آخرى بتفاوت مختلف حسب الجنس وميول الشخص وكيف ي/تحب ممارسة الجنس وبعض التفاصيل الأخرى

يوجد نشاط “كتير مهضوم” غداً يوم الخميس 26 من آذار.

صراحةً، أنا وصلت إلى رابط النشاط بالصدفة ولم يكن في حيلتي غير أن أصاب بجلطة خفيفة وأنا أقرأ التفاصيل. النشاط منظم من قبل مجموعة بإسم “Search for Common Ground-sfcg” وهي عبارة عن دعوة عامة للجميع لزيارة مخفر رأس بيروت بين الساعة 10صباحاً لغاية 4 من بعد الظهر (يعني ضمن دوام العمل للأشخاص الموظفين).

والله مش مزحة، الجماعة عم يحكوا جد! بين الساعة 10ص و4ب.ظ.، يمكن لأي شخص أن يزور المخفر “ويقابل عناصر الشرطة ويستفسر منهم عن عملهم اليومي ويتفرج على المركز الجديد ويكتشف أقسام المركز المختلفة”. و على ما يبدو أن هذا النشاط “سوف يجعل المركز أكثر انفتاحاً للجميع (more accessible) ويشجع المواطنين للذهاب إلى السلطة الأمنية فيه عند الحاجة”.

بغض النظر عن القفزة النوعية بين تصوّر النشاط والتخيلات حول التغيرات التي سوف يحدثها، كنت مهتم كثيراً بزيارة قسم الآداب في نفس المبنى بحيث إنه من أحد الأقسام في المبنى نفسه وإن كان إدارياً منفصل. ولكن يبدو أن سياسة الباب المقتوح هي أكثر إلى شباك صغير مع فتحة متواضعة.

كنت أفضل لو أستطيع مشاركتكم بعض المحادثات الطفيفة التي حصلت ولكن يبدو أنه ممنوع التعليق. فقد قامت sfcg بإزالة جميع الأسئلة والتعليقات ومنعت وضع أي تعليق جديد. لحسن الحظ إن هذا التكتيك غير مفاجئ وقام العديد من الأشخاص بأخذ نسخة عن التعليقات.

 unnamed

عموماً ما كان في جواب، لا على سؤالي ولا على أسئلة الأشخاص الأخرين حول امكانية زيارة غرف التعذيب أو مصادرة الهواتف وخرق المعلومات الشخصية عليها أو إن أمكن حضور أحد الأصدقاء السوريين/ات معنا للنشاط بدون الحاجة للمرور بالأمن العام.

Advertisements
Aside

Gay Assimilation is Not a Joke

I stumbled on the below meme a while ago at the LGBT media monitor and I was pretty dejected about its message. To my surprise, it was originally shared by Helem. Following a simple inspection, it turned out to have passed unchecked to reach the Facebook page of the organization and later on shared by some individuals on their personal profiles.

Now the problem and the reason that I wrote this post up is that although the image was taken down, the debate that followed it and the attempts to justify this meme-picture were flimsy and ill-suited. And I believe it is very important that we address the whole normal/non-normal (natural/unnatural) argument practically.

1236516_10151955338801491_1042306045_n

The meme shows two important messages. In the first (mid picture in the bottom row) it assumes that the media has moved from a portrayal of shame to that of objective support. In the second, it portrays “gays” and “lesbian” to be normal people and in that sense not to be effeminate (top left pic), into parties (top mid pic) or a bunch of girls with bad make up taking a selfie (top right pic).

The basics: what is gay assimilation

Gay assimilation is based on making [queer] people seem average and similar to the general population. Assimilation based strategies are based on normalizing gay men and women into the sphere of everyday life. Assimilation in western movements are based on the 4M’s; Marriage equality, Military enlisting, Media visibility and Making money (of these, we have locally capitalized on the latter two). In many assimilation rhetoric, bisexuals and Trans* people are usually left out as well as queers who intersect with other disenfranchised groups (refugees, foreign workers, women, elderly, etc…). This lack of inclusion might be because they usually can not fit into the (hetero/homo)normative system and expectations of the general society.

We should not “normalize” Trans*sexuality and/or Homosexuality

Queers that have long been outside the sphere of general society. We have been able to see what a sexist, racist, agist, and able-focused society that we live in (among many other lousy ists). We have witnessed the ease by which people are ostracized from their communities once they do not conform to this system.

So the reasons why we don’t want to normalize our bodies and our sexualities are three folds (at least as how I perceive them)

  1. The system is flawed. It is oppressive and unfair. To want to get back into it and assimilate into it means that we approve of such flaws and are ready to allow them to be practiced on other groups as long as they are not us, the normal people who obey and have become docile.
  2. Every inclusion is reciprocated by an exclusion. We only define the in-group by identifying the out-group. By normalizing trans*sexuality, we categorize the rules and regulations for trans* people to follow and those who do not adhere to these rules remain outside. For example, a trans* person can only apply to change the gender on their ID cards when they have underwent all the surgeries to achieve an appearance of the other sex which reflects a extremist binary perception of gender and those who don’t fall on these two extremes are left out of this inclusion.
    Normalization opens the way to “othering” those who do not conform to this new normal.
  3. By assimilating into a system, we feed it and it grows. We provide it with the needed legitimacy to uphold its position and its flaws in the face of other disenfranchised groups. It also makes it harder for these groups to penetrate the system and to dismantle as we all should be doing.

It is not a joke. It is not about being politically correct.

It would be very childish to brush off the meme as a joke and humor. Jokes that do not challenge existing oppressive systems but rather supports them and enrich them are damaging as they “normalize” the problem at hand.

Advocating for assimilation is a serious and grave matter. Assimilation is a lousy business that supports and gives rise to homonormative concepts that parallel the oppressive heteronormative system. Homonormativity assumes that queers want to be just like heteronormative people and follow similar rules as they do.

HOMONORMATIVITY:  “A politics that does not contest dominant heteronormative assumptions and institutions, but upholds and sustains them, while promising the possibility of a demobilized gay constituency and a privatized, depoliticized gay culture anchored in domesticity and consumption”
–(Duggan 2003)

So No. When we say that we do not want to be normal or nomalized, it means that we reject the idea to make docile bodies out of ours. It means that we reject the concept that we can say who is normal and who is not, who is illegal and who is legal and so on. Rejecting assimilationist politics means that we agree that we can not move forward by leaving other groups behind.

Basically assimilation sucks because it is always done along predictable lines of middle class, [Lebanese], male, able-bodied, straight privilege. So what is “normal” is usually very strongly associated with these meanings. Which then leaves out those of us who can’t be Lebanese, who can’t appear cis-gender because we don’t have the money to look cis-gender and probably never will, etc. It’s normalizing a certain ideal without actually admitting it’s a very narrow ideal that is inaccessible to many many many of us in the queer community. That’s why it’s not funny: it’s leaving so many of us out.
–Dree, a friend